Perinatal loss care, between the lines.
A five-theme reading of survey responses from 49 loss records — what participants needed, what they received, and the quiet distance between the two.
Methodology. n=49 loss records from 44 completed and 5 near-complete responses (99%+ progress). Race/ethnicity uses single-bucket method — each respondent counted in one group, with multi-ethnic respondents grouped separately. Yes/No questions (compassion, race impact, grievance) computed at respondent level: a respondent is counted as "Yes" if they reported yes for any of their losses. Multi-select questions counted per respondent (each person counted once per option selected).
Who is in the data.
Where respondents received care and how they identify. (n=49 loss records)
Sample over-represents Black/African American and Hispanic respondents relative to county demographics — consistent with the study's focus on disparities.
Support drops off after the immediate loss.
At which points did you most need support that you did not receive? (n=49, multi-select)
Participants felt forgotten — grief was not acknowledged.
What support did you need but not receive? (n=49, multi-select)
Inconsistency of care — no single standard.
Compassion, communication, and race-influenced care varied widely between providers.
Methodology. Crosstabs computed at respondent level (n=49 total). A respondent is counted as "Yes" if they reported race impacted care for any of their losses. 13 respondents did not answer this question.
Partners and family carry the primary support load.
Who supported you during and after your loss? (n=49, multi-select, paired)
Formal supports remain limited.
Structural and emotional barriers after loss — and the topics participants wish they'd been told about. (n=49, multi-select)